In the time and place of my initial ministry training, no one ever articulated a vision of ministry as a career path that would lead to material prosperity or success. And yet those who served as models of the ministry being taught were indeed quite successful—even when measured by the world’s standards. As a result, we students acquired a picture of successful ministry which was a composite of spiritual and worldly definitions. Anointing and success were conflated; an exceedingly growing ministry was the mark of an exceedingly growing faith and anointing. And—as everyone knew but no one ever said—this kind of anointing was a sign of God’s approval.
Of course no one entered ministry for the purpose of obtaining material success or position; it was understood that ministry was a call of God to “w-o-r-k” and service. Yet once in ministry, one’s faithfulness and faith—in combination with God’s anointing—would produce measurable “success.” The goal then became a large church, ministry or outreach. “Big” signified more anointing, more approval, and potentially more faith. Mind you, caveats were always offered: a pastorate in a town of 2,000 would face constraints on its growth that one in a town of 200,000 did not. However in any setting, church growth became an matter of numbers. A pastor’s value was determined by his congregation’s size, budget and buildings; the itinerant preacher’s worth ascertained by his or her schedule. Mailing lists and offerings were evidence that one operated in the will of God; meeting size revealed the level of anointing. Small was not in itself bad, but the unspoken conviction held that if anointed, no ministry or church would ever remain small.
An unintended consequence of the conflation of worldly and spiritual definitions of success in ministry was to turn every ministry setback, failure or decrease into a manifestation of sin. Once numerical (and consequently monetary) growth became the hallmark of success, who one knew (rather than Who one served) became vitally important. A ministry star-system developed, generating competition to enter its ranks. Attendance at or participation in the right meetings conferred special status, while seats in the front row garnered attention. Relationships were reduced to networking, while competition replaced mentoring. Conversations offered opportunities to boast of one’s status through the dropping of names and the “sharing of inside information” about big-time ministers. Inside knowledge secured greater access, which purportedly revealed the anointing and favor of God.
What would the apostle Paul make of this ministry paradigm? He defined his ministry credentials plainly in 2 Corinthians 6:3–10:
(3) We put no stumbling block in anyone’s path, so that our ministry will not be discredited. (4) Rather, as servants of God we commend ourselves in every way: in great endurance; in troubles, hardships and distresses; (5) in beatings, imprisonments and riots; in hard work, sleepless nights and hunger; (6) in purity, understanding, patience and kindness; in the Holy Spirit and in sincere love; (7) in truthful speech and in the power of God; with weapons of righteousness in the right hand and in the left; (
through glory and dishonor, bad report and good report; genuine, yet regarded as impostors; (9) known, yet regarded as unknown; dying, and yet we live on; beaten, and yet not killed; (10) sorrowful, yet always rejoicing; poor, yet making many rich; having nothing, and yet possessing everything.
For Paul, the anointing of God was manifested in his endurance of suffering and resilience in the face of adversity. Success was not a matter of increase, but the church’s—corporate and individual—reception of the Spirit (Gal 3:2–3). Although singularly driven by his call to preach to the Gentiles, his writings express less a concern with numerical growth than with the apprehension of the gospel and its power.
Are we so enamored with an increase in numbers—an increase in attendance, offerings, programs, budgets and outreaches—that we unconsciously devalue the individual Christian? Do we envy the mega-church while nodding our heads sympathetically yet condescendingly at the pastor of fifty? What has become our goal in ministry?
Have we been so influenced by the world’s definitions that we pursue institutional growth over individual growth? Can we have both or must we chose? I wonder. I fear that ministry has become all about numbers, money and size. It has devolved into a business that trades in compassion and life-skills coaching. We need to do some serious reflection on the plans, purposes and pursuits of ministry in the church today. And we need to do it with a bold, forthright honesty. None of us—particularly me—is free from this. And the human heart is deceitful above all else. But there is a judgment—for everyone—that is coming. May God have mercy on us and His Church.
